• deleuran posted an update 6 months ago

    Let’s consider the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.

    Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc’s server resources with other users.

    Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

    The rental type has the advantage of having a server on idc, so that it doesn’t have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

    However, you have to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

    There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.

    Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

    It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it’s a company.

    It is because it really is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.

    Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.

    It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.

    If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

    OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

    By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company’s homepage as well as the Webhard’s original function, the thought of developing a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the perfect solution is.

    The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, that may be fully built in Soho, so the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.

    It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.

    Rental vs. Construction.

    Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files on the internet at a set monthly cost. This means that using web hard has become common.

    But it’s not just recently that this concept arrived, and it’s true that it’s been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn’t sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.

    The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses based on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.

    In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users’ needs. p2p 추천 of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), that is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.

    NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It’s a really good feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.

    Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word “basic” implies, it isn’t a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. As a result, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it’s a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that’s less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.

    Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I’ll check out the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one in line with the reality and needs.

Skip to toolbar