hubcapsubway02 posted an update 9 months, 2 weeks ago
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.
Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.
When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It’s rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).
It includes a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.
Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only should be in a folder.
You should share a URL so you can’t share music files or videos.
According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It’s a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It’s far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it’s the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, let’s assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it’s often cut off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it’s about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn’t smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it’s in that state, you will need to find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.
It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.
Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn’t bother me.
There are the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It’s a tiny problem that the app doesn’t connect at all on mobile, but it’s the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn’t stipulated by company policy.
If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you’re going to sink and work with MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It’s the best in the world with regards to media reading.
There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn’t work with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit which can be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It’s practically infinite unless you’re going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards…
There exists a saying that changes in documents can’t be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn’t flip different files like picture documents.
p2p 순위 The dropbox itself can’t be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.
In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little use of the net page’s resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It’s even worse than Google Drive, which says it’s disadvantageous above. It’s easier to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it’s better than Dropbox, but it’s less than Google Drive).
It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***
The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive’s may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we’ve often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn’t that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.